Thursday, 28 November 2013

list of technologies

at the moment we are using guns with bullets. are technologies aren't advanced enough to get to the technologies we see in sci-fy such as the plasma gun.




Theoretically, plasma rifles could exist. The basic principle of plasma weapons revolves around the fact that plasma has some magnetic properties, and can be directed with either an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) or a rail accelerator, also known as an EMP beam. 

There is almost no difference between the two methods of directing plasma, except that an EMP by itself spreads out in a ring around the transmitter. This method is only practical for plasma bombs, which the United States Navy is rumored to be developing at the China Lake Test Facility, though without the use of EMP. The rail accelerator, on the other hand, directs the EMP, hence the secondary name of EMP beam. It is the fundamental principle behind the rail gun: a metal rail or tube is charged and discharged at a very high rate, normally in excess of 30 Mhz, with a very high electric potential difference, upwards of 10,000 volts, which produces an electromagnetic field running the length of the rail or tube. The material used for the rail or tube (how about I just call it a barrel?) is what is known as a dielectric, a material that can be rapidly charged and discharged without retaining a static charge. (This rapid discharging creates small EMPs.) The effect of the dielectric is such that it creates an anti-gravity field in the direction its discharging surface is facing. In the case of a rail gun, the discharging surface is facing the center and slightly towards the end of the barrel, creating a frictionless barrel for the ammunition to pass through. (Note: since the discharging surface creates small EMPs, the EMPs are directed and focused into a beam due to the inward facing discharging surface of the dielectric. Hence the name EMP beam.) After the barrel is charged, the ammunition is inserted into the firing chamber (an extenxion of the barrel, also dielectric to produce the anti-gravity field) and charged with another high voltage, opposite the barrel of the gun, but not enough to keep it from being attracted to another high voltage component that will be at the end of the barrel. This muzzle piece has a steady charge, opposite the charge of the ammunition, so that the two will be attracted. They both retain the same voltage, effectively doubling the difference in charge. Once the ammunition is charged, it is released into the barrel, with the anti-gravity field pulling it along at a very high speed, possibly up to the speed of electricity, which is 604,500,000 feet per second in a vacuum. As the ammunition reaches the charged muzzle piece, the muzzle discharges, sending the projectile out of the barrel and along its path. The amunition for a rail gun would most likely be a very dense metal with massively strong magnetic properties, perhaps depleted Francium.

A plasma rifle can operate on the same principle as a rail gun, just replacing the ammunition with plasma. Plasma is defined as a substance which is undergoing constant nuclear reaction. The electrons produced by such reactions creates strong magnetic properties within the plasma, which can be used by an electric field to attract the plasma to it. In essence, a plasma has the same magnetic properties as metals do. Therefore, the plasma rifle operates the same as the rail gun, except the muzzle velocity of the plasma rifle is greatly reduced due to the fact that plasma is much more dense than the sabot rounds used by the rail gun. A very small amount of plasma is required to do massive amounts of damage,however, so a person may not need to carry that much plasma with them to have enough to destroy, say, a whole infantry battalion. The reason behind this is that plasma cannot be contained in anything less than a magnetic field, as it is extremely hot and can melt even carbon, which has the highest melting point of any of the known elements. 

This post is getting a little long-winded, so I think I'll end it here. And yes, I was bored when I wrote this; somebody in Disorder's "Plasma-rifle" post asked if a multi-ammo gun could exist, and I started to explain the plasma rifle's feasibility instead. Oh well . . .


Thursday, 21 November 2013

tech in games to real life video


Extra Lives

life is not a big deal in video games, yes you don't want to die but if you happen to you can come back to life
but you don't get that option in real life but maybe in the future you will, 

scientist are making artificial bodies with limes and organs.
athletes with prosthetic limes maybe and in my opinion will. technology is advancing so far that in the near future we will see a change in prosthetic.

according 
 
  


Thursday, 7 November 2013

is this real life or just fantasy

speaker Jacques Lascan  philosopher

relating to realism and fantasy

starting of fraud and arcadien anallisce how does he interpret things shuch as animals object and excreta
saying when we are born we don't know what anything really is, and we don't even know what we even are who or kind of what we are. the first things we see are are hands. also baby use all there other scenes to figer out what things are but still don't only over time and when they start growing and becoming more developed, this is leading up to the mirror stage.
the mirrors stage is when we figer out what we are.

we see are self in reverse to other people.

experiment put a sticker on the head of a baby  and they try to take the sticker of there had of the mirror not them self.


projecting/reflecting self-image

when we get new hair cuts and what we wear is after the mirror stage what people look like and how we would like to be viewed.
this is fantasy also this can be mixed with other things such as ideologue, desire, vanity  

what do we want, why do we want it and  how do we know we want it
we desire threw a social and unsocial constructs.

the way we look affects are social life and career life some times you  have to where a curtain thing depends what areas  you live in also there friends example goths and chav's, jobs and even religion. then you have personal choice in what you would prefer to look like in general.

niel postman saying what you  get in the news like a cuddly puppy and then the sports to decetersize


    the big one


god
religion rules
a grand narrative, which orders are lives
the symbolic space within which we dwell

these are other things that controls are desire.

talking about the force

han solo is saying there is not a power that is controlling himself.
are desired are told for us there is something saying that we want


transgression

something that is transgressive is goes agents moral and social bounders

the big one defines all of our lives so if we are being controlled by the big one transgressing gives us control of are lives

fight club in part its about escaping from the big other, we desire these are the things we want Ikea.
when I had a job it was so repetitive I began to hate it, which does want you to make you transgress escape

in religion we desire what we want treat thows like you'd want to be treated your self and we uses the law to say how, don't do this and don't do that you can do this you can do that.

Fantasy

dangerous desires can be satisfied safety through fantasy  
" fantasy serves as the screen that protects us being over helmed by the raw real" by slavoj vivek

 reality(real life) and I ex scape  via video games and that's my fantasy, in my fantasy i can do things what I want to do but cant. it gives me excitement that I cant get in real life.

understanding the boundaries know what's real and what's fantasy when im playing fantasy eg video games i always know that im still in real life im not in the game. but iv been watching the ocular rif goggles they say that Emerson is 10 time greater which is amazing but also bad.   






Thursday, 24 October 2013

the desert of the real

authenticity of real gives meaning to the reality

quote from Oscar Wilde

"most people are other people. their thoughts are someone else's opinions their lives a mimicry,their passions a quotation"

my thought of this?  yes many people have there own opinions which usually gathers in to the same opinion but you are your own person that has a voice and may have different opinions, maybe about the same subject or another you mite agree with the same thing but till a curtain point. also your thoughts could be right or wrong.

Mary Kelly, in art in theory

the production of authenticity requires more than an aether for the object it extracts the truth of the authorial discourse.

it requires more the the author yes. it requires the audience also to say if its original and to argues why and what makes it so. 


Walter Benjamin talks about the Mona Lisa being in the room and ones its been reproduces it excites in one then one play so its not now the original because of that.
yes this is true in a way but every ones knows that these  copy's are in fact a copy's unless you don't know then you can say that a copy can be a originals and even that hard because we have professions that know the difference that can tell.  


Mary Kelly

it is no longer a question of good art, but of serious artist.


with the matrix the characters in the matrix start to know that they are in matrix, and Borges says they wouldn't know, its all part of the same reality.

Disney land becomes a copy of the out side.


then you these shells of people

ofentic non ofentic reality non reality  


matrix scene of Syther in the restaurant. the meaning about this scene? does reality matter syther knows that the steak hes eating is fake but still enjoys it. he unhappy with his really life so he wants another life in a fake world, and with his memory erased will now be comes real.


British museum Egyptian displays we are digging people up so after time we still believe in them

wants you get copy's of copy's then things gets inauthentic.

Thursday, 17 October 2013

x factor

the finals have guest appearances from JLS, one Direction also gets hosted by Olly Murs they are all runner ups so they don't even have to win, to win but this only works if the person/groups is  remembered  as good funny or even horrible to a point when you become focused on so example Franky Cocozza.
and the point  of the show is to win to become a star.


the point of the show is to change the life of a normal person who has a good talent of singing and make them into a pop star.
Fredric Jameson says "When real is no longer what it used to be".reality; of the second truth,objectivity and authenticity. they is an escalation of truth. if one of the contest-dance has had a bad life its some times blown out of proportion.
authenticity of truth and falseness its becoming a fine line.

its becoming very repetitive season after season we have seen the same thing again and again a sing with a bad life that has a amazing voice,we are allowing the truth to be stretched simply for entertainment.


little mix is in essence a tribute of girls allowed but girls allowed aren't original.

looking at the    

Thursday, 10 October 2013

shooting the messenger

 grand narratives culturally constructed narrative which explain 'the way things are'
religion for example it it explain faith by religion.
mite be other ways of looking


Rolland Barthes 
(1968)
'The death of the Author in Harrison, C.& Wood,P (2003) Art in theory.

the author gives meaning to the text in the broadest way.

" we know about Van Gogh's work Because we know about than Van Gogh.


we read the voice as a single person and he saying that this shouldn't really be the case.

Surrealism 

writing about the work the author gets talked also.

cut and paste is a very modern strategy style used my Quieten Taratino.

a text doesn't have a fix meaning this gives critersisum

language already excites we already have a knowledge of it.


we see some kind of art, and  we recognise it before because we have seen it before its very hard to make something original because of this.