authenticity of real gives meaning to the reality
quote from Oscar Wilde
"most people are other people. their thoughts are someone else's opinions their lives a mimicry,their passions a quotation"
my thought of this? yes many people have there own opinions which usually gathers in to the same opinion but you are your own person that has a voice and may have different opinions, maybe about the same subject or another you mite agree with the same thing but till a curtain point. also your thoughts could be right or wrong.
Mary Kelly, in art in theory
the production of authenticity requires more than an aether for the object it extracts the truth of the authorial discourse.
it requires more the the author yes. it requires the audience also to say if its original and to argues why and what makes it so.
Walter Benjamin talks about the Mona Lisa being in the room and ones its been reproduces it excites in one then one play so its not now the original because of that.
yes this is true in a way but every ones knows that these copy's are in fact a copy's unless you don't know then you can say that a copy can be a originals and even that hard because we have professions that know the difference that can tell.
Mary Kelly
it is no longer a question of good art, but of serious artist.
with the matrix the characters in the matrix start to know that they are in matrix, and Borges says they wouldn't know, its all part of the same reality.
Disney land becomes a copy of the out side.
then you these shells of people
ofentic non ofentic reality non reality
matrix scene of Syther in the restaurant. the meaning about this scene? does reality matter syther knows that the steak hes eating is fake but still enjoys it. he unhappy with his really life so he wants another life in a fake world, and with his memory erased will now be comes real.
British museum Egyptian displays we are digging people up so after time we still believe in them
wants you get copy's of copy's then things gets inauthentic.
Thursday, 24 October 2013
Thursday, 17 October 2013
x factor
the finals have guest appearances from JLS, one Direction also gets hosted by Olly Murs they are all runner ups so they don't even have to win, to win but this only works if the person/groups is remembered as good funny or even horrible to a point when you become focused on so example Franky Cocozza.
and the point of the show is to win to become a star.
the point of the show is to change the life of a normal person who has a good talent of singing and make them into a pop star.
Fredric Jameson says "When real is no longer what it used to be".reality; of the second truth,objectivity and authenticity. they is an escalation of truth. if one of the contest-dance has had a bad life its some times blown out of proportion.
authenticity of truth and falseness its becoming a fine line.
its becoming very repetitive season after season we have seen the same thing again and again a sing with a bad life that has a amazing voice,we are allowing the truth to be stretched simply for entertainment.
little mix is in essence a tribute of girls allowed but girls allowed aren't original.
looking at the
and the point of the show is to win to become a star.
the point of the show is to change the life of a normal person who has a good talent of singing and make them into a pop star.
Fredric Jameson says "When real is no longer what it used to be".reality; of the second truth,objectivity and authenticity. they is an escalation of truth. if one of the contest-dance has had a bad life its some times blown out of proportion.
authenticity of truth and falseness its becoming a fine line.
its becoming very repetitive season after season we have seen the same thing again and again a sing with a bad life that has a amazing voice,we are allowing the truth to be stretched simply for entertainment.
little mix is in essence a tribute of girls allowed but girls allowed aren't original.
looking at the
Thursday, 10 October 2013
shooting the messenger
grand narratives culturally constructed narrative which explain 'the way things are'
religion for example it it explain faith by religion.
mite be other ways of looking
Rolland Barthes
(1968)
'The death of the Author in Harrison, C.& Wood,P (2003) Art in theory.
the author gives meaning to the text in the broadest way.
" we know about Van Gogh's work Because we know about than Van Gogh.
we read the voice as a single person and he saying that this shouldn't really be the case.
Surrealism
writing about the work the author gets talked also.
cut and paste is a very modern strategy style used my Quieten Taratino.
a text doesn't have a fix meaning this gives critersisum
language already excites we already have a knowledge of it.
we see some kind of art, and we recognise it before because we have seen it before its very hard to make something original because of this.
religion for example it it explain faith by religion.
mite be other ways of looking
Rolland Barthes
(1968)
'The death of the Author in Harrison, C.& Wood,P (2003) Art in theory.
the author gives meaning to the text in the broadest way.
" we know about Van Gogh's work Because we know about than Van Gogh.
we read the voice as a single person and he saying that this shouldn't really be the case.
Surrealism
writing about the work the author gets talked also.
cut and paste is a very modern strategy style used my Quieten Taratino.
a text doesn't have a fix meaning this gives critersisum
language already excites we already have a knowledge of it.
we see some kind of art, and we recognise it before because we have seen it before its very hard to make something original because of this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)